Citation Inventory — docs/
Working artifact. Lists every cited work currently in
docs/, with a confidence rating per item, ahead of building a canonicaldocs/sources.jsonbibliography. Once the bibliography is built and verified, this file can be removed. See ai-assisted-research.md for the citation-verification policy this artifact serves.
Confidence scale:
- HIGH — canonical work, citation matches authoritative bibliographies.
- MEDIUM — author and main work clearly real, but specifics (subtitle, translation year, translators, exact venue/issue) are not bet-on-it confident without checking.
- LOW / VERY LOW — would not assert without verification.
- MARKED — the doc itself already flags this with a
[verify]/[citation needed]style marker; ratings carry forward as-is.
Baker, Keith Michael — “Defining the Public Sphere in Eighteenth-Century France” (1992)
- Inferred full citation: Baker, Keith Michael. “Defining the Public Sphere in Eighteenth-Century France.” In Craig Calhoun, ed., Habermas and the Public Sphere, MIT Press, 1992. [page range not stated in doc]
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/habermas/bourgeois-public-sphere.md:3— name listed as a feminist/historiographical challenger to Habermasdocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/bourgeois-public-sphere.md:16— cited as revisionist disputing the causal-legitimating role of the public spheredocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/critiques.md:8— cited (against Landes) on a different reading of salon women / Republic of Letters
- Confidence: HIGH
Berlin, Isaiah — “Two Concepts of Liberty” (1958)
- Inferred full citation: Berlin, Isaiah. “Two Concepts of Liberty.” Inaugural lecture, University of Oxford, 1958. (Reprinted in Four Essays on Liberty, Oxford University Press, 1969, and elsewhere.)
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:127— cited as the source of the negative/positive liberty distinction
- Confidence: HIGH
Bruns, Axel — Are Filter Bubbles Real? (2019)
- Inferred full citation: Bruns, Axel. Are Filter Bubbles Real? Polity, 2019.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/habermas/further-transformation-2022.md:9— cited for empirical case against strong filter-bubble claims
- Confidence: HIGH (doc flags
[page ref to verify])
Calhoun, Craig (ed.) — Habermas and the Public Sphere (1992)
- Inferred full citation: Calhoun, Craig, ed. Habermas and the Public Sphere. MIT Press, 1992.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/habermas/bourgeois-public-sphere.md:16— cited as venue for Bakerdocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/critiques.md:7— cited as venue for Fraser reprint and Bakerdocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/critiques.md:8— cited as venue for Baker
- Confidence: HIGH
Chomsky, Noam, and Edward Herman — Manufacturing Consent (1988)
- Inferred full citation: Herman, Edward S., and Noam Chomsky. Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. Pantheon, 1988.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/habermas/refeudalization-1962.md:11— cited as origin of modern currency of “manufacture of consent”
- Confidence: HIGH
Cowan, Brian — The Social Life of Coffee (2005)
- Inferred full citation: Cowan, Brian. The Social Life of Coffee: The Emergence of the British Coffeehouse. Yale University Press, 2005.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/habermas/critiques.md:10— cited on contested deliberativeness of coffeehouse public sphere
- Confidence: HIGH (doc flags
[pagination to verify])
Durand, Cédric — Techno-féodalisme (2020)
- Inferred full citation: Durand, Cédric. Techno-féodalisme: Critique de l’économie numérique. Zones / La Découverte, 2020.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/habermas/mapping-to-techno-feudalism.md:3— cited as part of the techno-feudal literaturedocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/further-transformation-2022.md:13— name-checked alongside Varoufakis and Wark
- Confidence: HIGH (English translation appeared as Techno-Feudalism: On the Internet, Verso, 2024 — the doc cites only the French original)
Eley, Geoff — work cited as “Eley 1992”
- Inferred full citation: [not stated in doc] — most plausibly Eley, Geoff. “Nations, Publics, and Political Cultures: Placing Habermas in the Nineteenth Century.” In Craig Calhoun, ed., Habermas and the Public Sphere, MIT Press, 1992.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/habermas/bourgeois-public-sphere.md:3— name listed as challengerdocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/bourgeois-public-sphere.md:12— cited 1992 on constitutive exclusionsdocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/refeudalization-1962.md:20— cited 1992 on plebeian counterpublics
- Confidence: MEDIUM (doc gives only “Eley 1992” without a title — most likely the Calhoun-volume essay, but doc does not state this)
Ellis, Markman — The Coffee House (2004)
- Inferred full citation: Ellis, Markman. The Coffee House: A Cultural History. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 2004.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/habermas/critiques.md:10— cited on contested deliberativeness of coffeehouse public sphere
- Confidence: HIGH (doc flags
[pagination to verify])
Fraser, Nancy — “Rethinking the Public Sphere” (1990)
- Inferred full citation: Fraser, Nancy. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” Social Text, no. 25/26, 1990, pp. 56–80. Reprinted in Craig Calhoun, ed., Habermas and the Public Sphere, MIT Press, 1992.
- Locations in docs:
docs/ai-assisted-research.md:28— name-checked re: smoothed-over disagreementsdocs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:126— cited as a standard challenge to Habermasdocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/README.md:17— listed as one of the key criticsdocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/bourgeois-public-sphere.md:3,12— cited as challengerdocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/refeudalization-1962.md:20— cited 1990 on constitutive exclusionsdocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/further-transformation-2022.md:8— cited 1990 on original public sphere’s exclusionsdocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/mapping-to-techno-feudalism.md:13— cited on counterpublics pluralisationdocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/communicative-action.md:9— cited on agonistic-pluralist critiquedocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/critiques.md:7— full citation givendocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/deliberative-social-app/open-questions.md:7— name-check on excluded demographicsdocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/deliberative-social-app/moves/federation.md:5— “Fraser’s correction”docs/techno-feudalism/habermas/deliberative-social-app/moves/README.md:12— “after Fraser”
- Confidence: HIGH
Goodman, Dena — The Republic of Letters (1994)
- Inferred full citation: Goodman, Dena. The Republic of Letters: A Cultural History of the French Enlightenment. Cornell University Press, 1994.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/habermas/critiques.md:8— cited as alternative reading of salon women
- Confidence: HIGH
Habermas, Jürgen — Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit (1962)
- Inferred full citation: Habermas, Jürgen. Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Luchterhand, 1962. English: The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Translated by Thomas Burger with the assistance of Frederick Lawrence. MIT Press, 1989. New German edition with new preface, Suhrkamp, 1990.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:126— bridge text referencedocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/README.md:6— central source for refeudalizationdocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/bourgeois-public-sphere.md:3,9— bibliographic origindocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/refeudalization-1962.md:3,5,7,10,11,16,18,20,22— central sourcedocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/mapping-to-techno-feudalism.md:3,9,11— central sourcedocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/critiques.md:3,11— central source
- Confidence: HIGH (doc flags
[preface page ref to verify]and various[§§ ref to verify])
Habermas, Jürgen — “Vorbereitende Bemerkungen zu einer Theorie der kommunikativen Kompetenz” (1971)
- Inferred full citation: Habermas, Jürgen. “Vorbereitende Bemerkungen zu einer Theorie der kommunikativen Kompetenz.” In Jürgen Habermas and Niklas Luhmann, Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie — Was leistet die Systemforschung? Suhrkamp, 1971.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/habermas/communicative-action.md:8— cited as origin of ideal speech situation concept
- Confidence: MEDIUM (doc flags
[pagination to verify])
Habermas, Jürgen — “Wahrheitstheorien” (1973)
- Inferred full citation: Habermas, Jürgen. “Wahrheitstheorien.” In Helmut Fahrenbach, ed., Wirklichkeit und Reflexion: Walter Schulz zum 60. Geburtstag, Neske, 1973. [exact pagination not stated in doc]
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/habermas/communicative-action.md:8— cited alongside the 1971 essay as origin of ideal speech situation
- Confidence: MEDIUM (doc flags
[pagination to verify])
Habermas, Jürgen — Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns (1981)
- Inferred full citation: Habermas, Jürgen. Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns. 2 vols. Suhrkamp, 1981. English: The Theory of Communicative Action. Translated by Thomas McCarthy. Vol. 1: Reason and the Rationalization of Society, Beacon Press, 1984. Vol. 2: Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason, Beacon Press, 1987.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/habermas/communicative-action.md:5,7— central source for communicative-action distinctiondocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/critiques.md:11— referenced in the early/later Habermas distinction
- Confidence: HIGH (doc flags
[Vol. 1 Ch. III page refs to verify])
Habermas, Jürgen — Moralbewußtsein und kommunikatives Handeln (1983)
- Inferred full citation: Habermas, Jürgen. Moralbewußtsein und kommunikatives Handeln. Suhrkamp, 1983. English: Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. MIT Press, 1990. [Translators: Christian Lenhardt and Shierry Weber Nicholsen, on standard bibliographies — not stated in doc.]
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/habermas/communicative-action.md:5— cited as discourse-ethics writings
- Confidence: HIGH (doc flags
[translators to verify]; pre-1996 German orthography is deliberate)
Habermas, Jürgen — Faktizität und Geltung (1992)
- Inferred full citation: Habermas, Jürgen. Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Suhrkamp, 1992. English: Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Translated by William Rehg. MIT Press, 1996.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/habermas/communicative-action.md:9— cited for discursive legitimacy as procedural normdocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/mapping-to-techno-feudalism.md:3— referenced as procedural-deliberative Habermasdocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/critiques.md:11— referenced re: regulative ideal
- Confidence: HIGH
Habermas, Jürgen — exchange with Rawls in Journal of Philosophy (1995)
- Inferred full citation: [not stated in doc] — standard reference: Habermas, Jürgen, “Reconciliation through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls’s Political Liberalism,” Journal of Philosophy 92(3), 1995, pp. 109–131; and Rawls, John, “Reply to Habermas,” Journal of Philosophy 92(3), 1995, pp. 132–180.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/habermas/communicative-action.md:9— referenced as the venue of the Habermas–Rawls dispute about “public reason”
- Confidence: MEDIUM (doc states only the venue and year; titles, issues, page numbers inferred)
Habermas, Jürgen — Wahrheit und Rechtfertigung (1999)
- Inferred full citation: Habermas, Jürgen. Wahrheit und Rechtfertigung: Philosophische Aufsätze. Suhrkamp, 1999. English: Truth and Justification. Translated and edited by Barbara Fultner. MIT Press, 2003.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/habermas/communicative-action.md:8— cited for later reframing of ideal speech situationdocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/critiques.md:11— cited for later reframing
- Confidence: HIGH
Habermas, Jürgen — “Überlegungen und Hypothesen…” / “Reflections and Hypotheses…” (2021/2022)
- Inferred full citation: Habermas, Jürgen. “Überlegungen und Hypothesen zu einem erneuten Strukturwandel der politischen Öffentlichkeit.” In Martin Seeliger and Sebastian Sevignani, eds., Ein neuer Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit?, Leviathan Sonderband 37, Nomos, 2021. English: “Reflections and Hypotheses on a Further Structural Transformation of the Political Public Sphere,” Theory, Culture & Society 39(4), 2022.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/habermas/README.md:8— cited as 2022 updatedocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/further-transformation-2022.md:5,9,11,13— central sourcedocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/mapping-to-techno-feudalism.md:3— citeddocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/deliberative-social-app/moves/gatekeeping.md:5— referenced via the 2022 update
- Confidence: MEDIUM (doc flags
[Sonderband number and editor list to verify],[vol/issue to verify],[verify against TCS 2022 / Leviathan 2021])
Horace — Epistles I.2.40 (“Sapere aude”)
- Inferred full citation: Horace. Epistulae I.2.40. (Roman, c. 20 BCE.)
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:70— cited as origin of “Sapere aude”
- Confidence: HIGH
Jefferson, Thomas — Declaration of Independence (1776)
- Inferred full citation: Declaration of Independence. Continental Congress, July 4, 1776. (Drafted principally by Thomas Jefferson.)
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:92— cited as key text
- Confidence: HIGH
Kant, Immanuel — “Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung?” (1784)
- Inferred full citation: Kant, Immanuel. “Beantwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklärung?” Berlinische Monatsschrift, December 1784, pp. 481–494.
- Locations in docs:
README.md:5— name-checked as origin of (Un)mündigkeitdocs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:68,70,73— central key workdocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/bourgeois-public-sphere.md:13,27— cited (Berlinische Monatsschrift, December 1784)
- Confidence: HIGH
Kant, Immanuel — Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten (1785)
- Inferred full citation: Kant, Immanuel. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Hartknoch, 1785.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:68,71,72— cited (Section II, AK 4:429 for Formula of Humanity)
- Confidence: HIGH
Kant, Immanuel — Kritik der praktischen Vernunft (1788)
- Inferred full citation: Kant, Immanuel. Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Hartknoch, 1788.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:68— listed as key work
- Confidence: HIGH
Krause, Sharon — work on Montesquieu
- Inferred full citation: [not stated in doc] — most plausibly Krause, Sharon R. Liberalism with Honor, Harvard University Press, 2002, or her articles on Montesquieu.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:31— cited as recent scholar contesting standard separation-of-powers reading
- Confidence: MARKED (doc flags
[Krause and Spector — citation needed])
Landes, Joan — Women and the Public Sphere in the Age of the French Revolution (1988)
- Inferred full citation: Landes, Joan B. Women and the Public Sphere in the Age of the French Revolution. Cornell University Press, 1988.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/habermas/README.md:17— listeddocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/bourgeois-public-sphere.md:3,12— citeddocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/refeudalization-1962.md:20— cited 1988 on genderdocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/critiques.md:5,8— full citation given
- Confidence: HIGH
Lippmann, Walter — Public Opinion (1922)
- Inferred full citation: Lippmann, Walter. Public Opinion. Harcourt, Brace, 1922.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/habermas/refeudalization-1962.md:11— cited Ch. XV for “manufacture of consent”
- Confidence: HIGH (doc flags
[page ref to verify]; standard reference is Part V “The Making of a Common Will,” Ch. XV “Leaders and the Rank and File”)
Locke, John — Two Treatises of Government (1689)
- Inferred full citation: Locke, John. Two Treatises of Government. Awnsham Churchill, 1689 (dated 1690 on title page).
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:21,23— cited as key works (Second Treatise §27 quoted)
- Confidence: HIGH (direct quotation “Every man has a property in his own person” at Second Treatise §27 is correctly attributed)
Mah, Harold — “Phantasies of the Public Sphere” (c. 2000)
- Inferred full citation: Mah, Harold. “Phantasies of the Public Sphere: Rethinking the Habermas of Historians.” Journal of Modern History [vol/issue/page not stated in doc, doc says generally cited as 2000].
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/habermas/bourgeois-public-sphere.md:16— cited as revisionist
- Confidence: MARKED (article is real; standard bibliography places it as JMH 72(1), March 2000, pp. 153–182, but doc does not state this)
Mill, John Stuart — On Liberty (1859)
- Inferred full citation: Mill, John Stuart. On Liberty. John W. Parker and Son, 1859. Cited edition: On Liberty and Other Writings, edited by Stefan Collini, Cambridge University Press, 1989.
- Locations in docs:
README.md:29— listed in lineagedocs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:100,102,103,104— central source (harm principle, tyranny of majority, individuality)
- Confidence: HIGH (doc flags
[page ref to verify]for Collini ed.; direct quotations are deferred / paraphrased per doc’s own notes)
Mill, John Stuart — The Subjection of Women (1869)
- Inferred full citation: Mill, John Stuart. The Subjection of Women. Longmans, Green, Reader, and Dyer, 1869.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:100— listed as key work
- Confidence: HIGH
Montesquieu — De l’esprit des lois (1748)
- Inferred full citation: Montesquieu, Charles-Louis de Secondat, baron de. De l’esprit des lois. Barrillot & fils, Geneva, 1748.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:31— cited as key work
- Confidence: HIGH
Morozov, Evgeny — “Critique of Techno-Feudal Reason” (2022)
- Inferred full citation: Morozov, Evgeny. “Critique of Techno-Feudal Reason.” New Left Review [issue not stated in doc; doc says “issue 133/134, 2022 to verify”].
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/habermas/mapping-to-techno-feudalism.md:3,21— cited as the dissenting voice on the techno-feudal frame
- Confidence: MARKED (standard bibliography places this in New Left Review II/133–134, January–April 2022)
Mouffe, Chantal — agonistic-pluralist position (no specific work cited)
- Inferred full citation: [not stated in doc]
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/habermas/refeudalization-1962.md:18— name-checked as agonistic-pluralist readerdocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/critiques.md:7— name-checked re: agonism
- Confidence: N/A (attribution-by-name without a cited work)
Negt, Oskar, and Alexander Kluge — Öffentlichkeit und Erfahrung (1972)
- Inferred full citation: Negt, Oskar, and Alexander Kluge. Öffentlichkeit und Erfahrung: Zur Organisationsanalyse von bürgerlicher und proletarischer Öffentlichkeit. Suhrkamp, 1972. English: Public Sphere and Experience: Toward an Analysis of the Bourgeois and Proletarian Public Sphere. University of Minnesota Press, 1993. [Translators: Peter Labanyi, Jamie Owen Daniel, Assenka Oksiloff — not stated in doc.]
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/habermas/README.md:17— listeddocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/critiques.md:5,9— full citation given
- Confidence: HIGH (doc flags
[translators to verify])
Otteson, James — Adam Smith scholarship
- Inferred full citation: [not stated in doc —
[work to cite]]. Otteson is a real Smith scholar (e.g., Adam Smith’s Marketplace of Life, Cambridge University Press, 2002), but the doc cites no specific work. - Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:56— cited as a libertarian Smith scholar
- Confidence: MARKED
Paine, Thomas — Common Sense (1776)
- Inferred full citation: Paine, Thomas. Common Sense. R. Bell, Philadelphia, 1776.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:85— listed as key work
- Confidence: HIGH
Paine, Thomas — Rights of Man (1791)
- Inferred full citation: Paine, Thomas. Rights of Man. J. S. Jordan, London, 1791 (Part I); 1792 (Part II).
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:85— listed as key work
- Confidence: HIGH
Paine, Thomas — The Age of Reason (1794)
- Inferred full citation: Paine, Thomas. The Age of Reason. Barrois, Paris, 1794 (Part I); 1795 (Part II).
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:85— listed as key work
- Confidence: HIGH
Pariser, Eli — The Filter Bubble (2011)
- Inferred full citation: Pariser, Eli. The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You. Penguin Press, 2011.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/habermas/further-transformation-2022.md:9— cited as origin of “filter bubble”
- Confidence: HIGH (doc flags
[page ref to verify])
Pettit, Philip — Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government (1997)
- Inferred full citation: Pettit, Philip. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford University Press, 1997.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:47,135— cited (in Rousseau section, and in open questions on republicanism revival)
- Confidence: HIGH
Pincus, Steve — “‘Coffee Politicians Does Create’” (c. 1995)
- Inferred full citation: Pincus, Steve. “‘Coffee Politicians Does Create’: Coffeehouses and Restoration Political Culture.” Journal of Modern History [vol/issue/pages not stated in doc; doc says “generally cited as 1995”].
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/habermas/critiques.md:10— cited
- Confidence: MARKED (standard bibliography: JMH 67(4), December 1995, pp. 807–834, but doc does not state this)
Rothschild, Emma — Economic Sentiments (2001)
- Inferred full citation: Rothschild, Emma. Economic Sentiments: Adam Smith, Condorcet, and the Enlightenment. Harvard University Press, 2001.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:56— cited as the dominant scholarly reading of Smith
- Confidence: HIGH (doc flags
[page ref to verify])
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques — Discours sur l’origine et les fondements de l’inégalité parmi les hommes (1755)
- Inferred full citation: Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Discours sur l’origine et les fondements de l’inégalité parmi les hommes. Marc-Michel Rey, Amsterdam, 1755.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:45,48,119— cited as the genealogy of artificial inequality
- Confidence: HIGH
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques — Du contrat social (1762)
- Inferred full citation: Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Du contrat social, ou principes du droit politique. Marc-Michel Rey, Amsterdam, 1762.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:45— quoted (“Man is born free…”, Book I Ch. 1)
- Confidence: HIGH (doc flags
[translator to verify]for the wording of the standard English translation)
Skinner, Quentin — Liberty before Liberalism (1998)
- Inferred full citation: Skinner, Quentin. Liberty before Liberalism. Cambridge University Press, 1998.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:135— cited
- Confidence: HIGH
Smith, Adam — The Theory of Moral Sentiments (1759)
- Inferred full citation: Smith, Adam. The Theory of Moral Sentiments. A. Millar, London / A. Kincaid and J. Bell, Edinburgh, 1759.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:54— listed as key work
- Confidence: HIGH
Smith, Adam — An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (1776)
- Inferred full citation: Smith, Adam. An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. W. Strahan and T. Cadell, 1776.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:54,56— quoted (IV.3.2 monopolising-spirit; I.X.II “people of the same trade”)
- Confidence: HIGH
Spector, Céline — work on Montesquieu
- Inferred full citation: [not stated in doc] — most plausibly Spector, Céline. Montesquieu: Pouvoirs, richesses et sociétés, PUF, 2004, or related works.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:31— cited as recent scholar contesting standard reading
- Confidence: MARKED (doc flags
[Krause and Spector — citation needed])
Spinoza, Baruch — Tractatus Theologico-Politicus (1670)
- Inferred full citation: Spinoza, Baruch. Tractatus Theologico-Politicus. Anonymous publication, [Amsterdam: Jan Rieuwertsz], 1670.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:13— cited (Ch. XX paraphrased)
- Confidence: HIGH
Varoufakis, Yanis — Technofeudalism (2023)
- Inferred full citation: Varoufakis, Yanis. Technofeudalism: What Killed Capitalism. Bodley Head (UK) / Melville House (US), 2023.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/README.md:43— cited as a working framingdocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/mapping-to-techno-feudalism.md:3— citeddocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/further-transformation-2022.md:13— name-checked
- Confidence: HIGH
Voltaire — Treatise on Tolerance (1763)
- Inferred full citation: Voltaire. Traité sur la tolérance, à l’occasion de la mort de Jean Calas. [s.l.], 1763.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:37— cited (on the Calas affair)
- Confidence: HIGH
Voltaire (apocryphal) — “I disapprove of what you say…”
- Inferred full citation: Hall, Evelyn Beatrice [writing as S. G. Tallentyre]. The Friends of Voltaire. Smith, Elder & Co., 1906.
- Locations in docs:
docs/ai-assisted-research.md:30— cited as a known misattributiondocs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:37— cited as Hall’s paraphrase, not Voltaire
- Confidence: MEDIUM (doc names “Hall’s paraphrase” without giving Hall’s full name or work)
Warner, Michael — Publics and Counterpublics (2002)
- Inferred full citation: Warner, Michael. Publics and Counterpublics. Zone Books, 2002.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/habermas/refeudalization-1962.md:18— cited as agonistic-pluralist reader
- Confidence: HIGH (doc flags
[page ref to verify])
Wark, McKenzie — Capital is Dead (2019)
- Inferred full citation: Wark, McKenzie. Capital is Dead: Is This Something Worse? Verso, 2019.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/habermas/mapping-to-techno-feudalism.md:3— cited as part of techno-feudal literaturedocs/techno-feudalism/habermas/further-transformation-2022.md:13— name-checked
- Confidence: HIGH
Winch, Donald — Adam Smith’s Politics (1978)
- Inferred full citation: Winch, Donald. Adam Smith’s Politics: An Essay in Historiographic Revision. Cambridge University Press, 1978.
- Locations in docs:
docs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:56— cited alongside Rothschild
- Confidence: HIGH (doc flags
[page ref to verify])
Wollstonecraft, Mary — A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792)
- Inferred full citation: Wollstonecraft, Mary. A Vindication of the Rights of Woman: With Strictures on Political and Moral Subjects. J. Johnson, 1792.
- Locations in docs:
README.md:29— listed in lineagedocs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:79— cited as key work
- Confidence: HIGH
Unsourced references
Named thinkers / claims in the docs without a specific cited work; flagged for completeness.
- Filmer, Robert — Patriarcha —
docs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:21— content reference rather than a bibliographic citation; circa-dates “c. 1630s–40s, published posthumously 1680” stated in the doc itself. - Marx on alienation —
docs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:133— named without a specific work. - Weber on rationalisation —
docs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:133— named without a specific work. - Foucault on disciplinary power —
docs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:133— named without a specific work. - Arendt on the social —
docs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:133— named without a specific work. - Frederick Douglass —
docs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:128— named. - Diderot, d’Alembert, and the Encyclopédie (1751–1772) —
docs/techno-feudalism/enlightenment-lineage.md:60,docs/ai-assisted-research.md:38— named as a project rather than a single citable work. Standard reference: Diderot, Denis, and Jean le Rond d’Alembert, eds. Encyclopédie, ou dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, Briasson et al., 1751–1772. - Chantal Mouffe — see entry above; named without a specific work.
Summary counts
- HIGH: 32 works
- MEDIUM: 6 works (Eley 1992; Habermas 1971 essay; Habermas 1973 “Wahrheitstheorien”; Habermas 2021/2022 essay; Habermas–Rawls 1995 J.Phil exchange; Voltaire-via-Hall apocryphal quotation)
- LOW: 0 works
- VERY LOW: 0 works
- MARKED (already flagged in docs): 6 works (Krause; Spector; Mah 2000; Pincus 1995; Morozov 2022 NLR; Otteson)
Highest-priority items to verify
The entries where a hallucination or mis-cite would be most damaging — items the docs cite confidently in body text but where training-derived knowledge is not bet-on-it:
- Habermas, “Reflections and Hypotheses on a Further Structural Transformation of the Political Public Sphere,” Theory, Culture & Society 39(4), 2022. — Doc itself flags vol/issue. The German Sonderband editors and Sonderband number (“Leviathan Sonderband 37, ed. Seeliger and Sevignani”) should be verified against the actual volume.
- Morozov, “Critique of Techno-Feudal Reason,” New Left Review 133/134, 2022. — Doc flags issue. Cited specifically against the techno-feudal frame; if the issue or year are off, the load-bearing dissent is not properly anchored.
- Mah, “Phantasies of the Public Sphere: Rethinking the Habermas of Historians,” Journal of Modern History (c. 2000). — Doc flags vol/issue/page.
- Pincus, “‘Coffee Politicians Does Create’: Coffeehouses and Restoration Political Culture,” Journal of Modern History (c. 1995). — Doc flags vol/issue/pages.
- Habermas, “Wahrheitstheorien” (1973) in Fahrenbach ed., Wirklichkeit und Reflexion (Neske, 1973). — Doc flags pagination.
- Habermas, “Vorbereitende Bemerkungen…” (1971) in Habermas/Luhmann, Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie (Suhrkamp, 1971). — Doc flags pagination.
- Habermas–Rawls 1995 exchange in Journal of Philosophy. — Doc names the venue and year but no titles or pagination.
- Lippmann, Public Opinion (1922) Ch. XV. — Doc flags page ref. Worth verifying the chapter location of “manufacture of consent” against the actual 1922 text.
- Smith, Wealth of Nations IV.3.2 — closest verifiable phrasing of the “monopolising spirit” passage. — Doc itself reconstructs the closest verifiable wording; worth a direct read against the Glasgow edition.
- Eley 1992 — cited only as “Eley 1992” three times. The doc never gives a title; if it intends his essay in Calhoun ed. 1992, that should be made explicit.